Wednsday's ramblings

What is bringing people out of the wood work? Is it the current debate over health care, or a growing mistrust among the American People of the Obama Administration and the Democrat Party. I think there is a "great awakening" among the American electorate. People are rediscovering what it means to be a people of Liberty. America is waking up. Why, because we know a sleazy sales pitch when we see one. Who do these guys think they are fooling ? How can we start up a new entitlement program as this will be and it be deficit neutral. We can't, it's impossible. Why are they in such a rush to pass this, because 2010 is an election year and the National Socialist Democrat (NSD) Party will never survive the next election with its majority intact if this debate rolls into the election season. They may not now anyway (hehe). But for now we are stuck with 'em. Assuming our Republic survives in it's present form long enough to make it to the "mid terms", the left is supplying plenty of issues for the fodder. I think what many people fear is the sense that our government is growing out of control, and the person at the controls has us on the wrong tracks. Socialism.

They contrive emergencies to justify government action.. An emergency was 9/11, an emergency was Hurricane Katrina's aftermath.Bailing out automobile manufactures to avoid their inevitable bankruptcy, firing the CEO of the company and then converting their bailout into government ownership, fascism ! Bullying debt holders to orchestrate bankruptcy proceedings. Thuggish ! An emergency is not spending money to avert a notional economic collapse that in reality was a market adjustment in an economic cycle. Passing a hurried, virtually unread, huge seven hundred plus billion dollar, one thousand ear mark spending fiasco, of which most will not kick in until 2010(election year) GO FIGURE !

Whether the political regime is Republican, or National Socialist Democrat as is now the case, whether the situation is real or manufactured as is now the case, the following pattern seems to happen. Create the sense of an emergency to justify the urgency to pass legislation into law to expand the role, power, and authority of government. The expanded government footprint almost never is reigned in, another layer of bureaucracy thus becomes entrenched. The law of unintended consequences must be considered when establishing new bureaucratic endeavors especially with regard to how future administrations use them.

We have Congressional over site, but as we have seen with the last two administrations, both Obama and Bush, when the power is concentrated in one party with both Congress and the President, the threat of Tyranny emerges because the willingness of congress to police its own parties president is not there. As the political divide continues to widen the swing in policy becomes more drastic. A program, policy, agency, or bureau that was once created as a deterrent against external threats could be used as a weapon against legitimate domestic descent. In this situation I am referring to the creation of a certain federal agency following 9/11. Upon the regime change, a short time there after the secretary of a department came out with a statement that identified right of center ideological entities as being suspicious. What ? Is the political infrastructure and only the powers that be knowing only what else is nearly in place preparing to bring about Change that nobody will want once implemented. If I sound suspicious I am.

The Catalyst of Change must be avoided. But what would that be ? Social unrest. Fringe groups stepping outside the political system inciting violence, or nothing. We must continue to use the democratic process to preserve the Republic in the present form that has been effective for over two centuries. If the threshold is crossed by a regime upon which our current form of government no longer exists, then the conversation must modified to correlate to the new paradyme. I don't believe that is a discussion we want to have under the present circumstance.